Expertise/Insolvency

Service

Asset Protection before Insolvency

If a company's financial position has deteriorated, its past transactions are assessed in advance as they would be examined in a possible bankruptcy case, and only lawful methods are selected for further dealings with its assets and debts.

We are most often instructed by:

  • Companies with overdue debts to creditors
  • Group companies securing each other's obligations
  • Owners and executives, including those who have given personal suretyships

The information on this website is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute a public offer.

What the Service Includes

Timing and Fees
–timing on request
from ₽fee on request

Timing and fees are indicative and are confirmed when the engagement is agreed.

01 / Overview
What reduces the risk

The timing of a transaction matters. In a bankruptcy case, the debtor's transactions are examined over periods that the law counts back from the court's acceptance of the petition to declare the debtor bankrupt: the closer a transaction is to that point, the wider the range of grounds on which it is examined. The assessment begins by determining which actions involving assets and liabilities are still possible in the current position.

A transaction is assessed by its substance. A transaction may be declared invalid if the other party provided inadequate consideration, including where the price or other terms are significantly worse for the debtor than those on which similar transactions are made in comparable circumstances. A flawlessly documented transaction without a genuine basis does not improve the company's position.

A purpose of causing harm is presumed, in particular, if the transaction was made without consideration or with an interested party at a time when the debtor already met the criterion of inability to pay or insufficiency of assets. A transaction made merely for appearance's sake is void.

Some of the risks concern the company's executives and participants. A person controlling the debtor may be held subsidiarily liable if creditors' claims cannot be paid in full as a result of that person's actions or omissions, in particular owing to transactions that caused significant harm to creditors or to missing or distorted accounting records.

A further ground relates to failure to file a debtor's petition. The law obliges the chief executive to file a debtor's petition when the circumstances specified in the law arise.

02 / Categories
Categories of situations
  • Arrears on several obligationsPayments to some creditors have stopped, demands and letters of claim are being received, and the order of payments is under discussion.
  • Claim by a major creditorA claim has been made whose size makes it possible to raise the question of opening a bankruptcy case.
  • Past transactions with assetsIn the preceding period, assets were transferred, exchanged or encumbered, and these transactions need to be analysed.
  • Property complex owned by the companyProduction facilities on which the continuation of the business depends.
  • Group of companies with mutual securityGroup members secure each other's obligations with suretyships and pledges.
  • Owner's personal suretyshipThe company's obligations are secured by the personal assets of the owner or chief executive.
  • Change of chief executive or sale of an interestA change in the persons who determine the company's decisions is under discussion.
03 / Outcome
Service Outcome
  • Written assessment of the positionThe state of liabilities and assets, the ownership structure, a list of the risks identified and their significance.
  • Analysis of past transactionsFor each, the grounds for examination in a bankruptcy case and the missing supporting evidence are identified.
  • Prepared justificationExplanations of transactions and of decisions of management bodies concerning their business purpose and the conditions in which they were made.
  • Draft agreements with creditorsChanges to the timing and terms of performance, replacement and addition of security.
  • Assessment of links between personal assets and company debtsSuretyships, pledges and the matrimonial property regime.
  • Sequence of further stepsWhat is to be done first and which actions increase the risk.

The outcome of the service is the work performed within the scope agreed with the client.

04 / Preparation
What the work is built on
  1. Materials

    The work is built on the company's documents and information; the following points are relevant.

    • Financial statements and accounting recordsFor the periods in which the transactions were made.
    • Contracts and primary documentsFor transactions and payments, including intra-group settlements.
    • Information on assetsComposition of assets, encumbrances, information on assets disposed of.
    • SecuritySuretyships, pledges and information on the persons who provided them.
    • Ownership structureParticipants, interested parties, decisions of management bodies.
    • Composition of creditorsA list of claims, information on arrears and on claims filed in court.
    • Owner's personal assetsThe owner's obligations relating to the company's affairs and the matrimonial property regime.
    • Purpose of the requestAssessment of the position, preparation for negotiations with creditors or analysis of transactions already made.
  2. Assessment

    On the basis of the materials, the risks, the possible solutions and their consequences are identified.

  3. Plan

    For the chosen option, a plan is drawn up: the sequence of steps, timing and scope of work.

05 / Projects
Selected Projects
01 / 04

Subsidiary Liability

Reversal of a subsidiary liability finding in the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation

Challenge

The insolvency administrator and creditors sought to hold the chief executive of the bankrupt company personally liable for its debts. The lower courts granted the claims.

What was done

The case was taken to the Supreme Court, the good faith of each management decision was proven, and the Supreme Court set aside those court rulings. The amount of liability avoided is comparable to the total amount of creditors' claims in the register.

Acting for the creditor

Inclusion of an affiliated creditor's claims in the register: five related bankruptcies

Challenge

Five parallel bankruptcy cases were under way within a group of companies. The client was a creditor affiliated with the debtor, and the courts applied subordination: its claims were lowered in ranking.

What was done

A legal position was developed demonstrating that there were no grounds for subordination. The court rulings were set aside, and the claims were included in the register in full, on an equal footing with independent creditors, in all five cases.

Returning assets to the bankruptcy estate

Recovery of assets diverted on the eve of insolvency

Challenge

The debtor had diverted its assets through a chain of formally independent transactions, each of which appeared to be an ordinary commercial operation.

What was done

The full chain was reconstructed, and the interconnection and invalidity of each link were proven. The assets were returned to the bankruptcy estate in full, and the creditors obtained a real source of repayment.

Asset Protection

Protecting a client's assets in a third party's insolvency

Challenge

An attempt was made, by challenging transactions, to include the client's property – acquired, paid for and in commercial use – in the bankruptcy estate of an insolvent counterparty.

What was done

A legal position was built confirming the independent nature of the client's title. The court dismissed all the challenges, and the assets were preserved in full, without concessions or settlement agreements.

06 / Questions
Frequently Asked Questions

Such transactions are examined as a priority in a bankruptcy case, and their consequences are usually the opposite of those expected: the assets are returned, and the transaction itself becomes an argument in claims against the executives and participants.

The work is approached differently: assessment of the actual position, restoring documents and corporate formalities, payments to creditors, and separating assets by legal means where there is a genuine basis. What is permissible in a particular situation is determined following the assessment of the position.

It is assessed which actions remain available: restoring documents, preparing explanations of past transactions and changing payment terms with creditors remain possible even as the position deteriorates further.

At the same time, it is checked whether the circumstances in which the law obliges the chief executive to file a debtor's petition have arisen, and a course of action for that event is determined.

The business purpose of the transaction, the adequacy of the consideration, whether the terms were at market level and the completeness of the supporting documents.

The analysis determines for which transactions justification is prepared first, what needs to be restored and which circumstances can no longer be changed.

Such steps neither extinguish the company's obligations nor rule out claims against the persons who determined its decisions in the preceding period.

In some cases they make it harder to access documents and information on the company's activities, and the state of the documents is later taken into account when the actions of the former management are assessed. The consequences of such decisions are assessed before they are taken.

It does, to the extent that personal assets are linked to the business's obligations: suretyships, pledges, other obligations of the owner relating to the company's affairs, and the matrimonial property regime.

The range of such links and the legal means of separation available are assessed, including changes to the terms of security with the creditor's consent. Means aimed at concealing assets from creditors are not used.

The two tracks are compatible: arrangements with creditors reduce the likelihood of a case being opened, and preparation reduces the risks if a case is opened nonetheless.

The sequence of steps is determined so that the correspondence and the proposed terms do not create additional grounds for examining transactions: the correspondence and terms are later assessed in the bankruptcy case.

An hourly rate, a fixed fee or a combined model is used; in some cases part of the fee depends on the outcome achieved. The fee is determined by the time actually spent, the complexity of the matter and the overall timeframe of the project, and is agreed before work begins.

Request a free consultation

Describe your matter and the circumstances in which it arose. The consultation establishes the possible structure of the work and the scope of legal support required.

Email us

Discuss your matter

Describe your situation and we will reply within 24 hours.

Discuss your matter

Describe your situation and we will reply within 24 hours.

Request sent

We will contact you within 24 hours